THE COVID DOSSIER
A record of military and intelligence coordination of the global Covid event
Loading...
Compiled by independent researchers Debbie Lerman and Sasha Latypova.

PDF file

THE COVID DOSSIER with IoJ Explainer Info.pdf

5.7 MB

Executive Summary
The Covid Dossier is a compilation of evidence supporting the claim that Covid was not a public health event, but a global operation coordinated through public-private intelligence and military alliances, invoking laws designed for CBRN weapons attacks.

Military Coordination
Evidence of military/intelligence coordination of Covid response in multiple countries

Global Frameworks
Use of emergency declarations and laws intended for bioweapons attacks

Censorship Operations
Military involvement in messaging, propaganda, and censorship efforts
Scope of the Dossier
The Dossier contains information on military/intelligence coordination of Covid response in multiple countries:
Countries Covered
  • United States
  • United Kingdom
  • Australia
  • Canada
Additional Countries
  • Netherlands
  • Germany
  • Italy
Key Information Documented

Military Agencies
Military/intelligence agencies in charge of each country's Covid response

Emergency Declarations
Dates and types of emergency declarations made in each country

Censorship Operations
Military/intelligence-related agencies involved in censorship/propaganda

Key Figures
Top people with military/intelligence jobs in leadership positions
Global Coordination
The Dossier also documents connections to global governing bodies through which the response was coordinated:
European Union
Coordination through EU mechanisms
United Nations
UN and WHO involvement
NATO
Response coordinated through NATO
Purpose of the Dossier
By providing this information in one place, we aim to:

Dispel Misconceptions
Challenge the notion that Covid was a public health event managed independently by each country's health agencies

Reveal Military Involvement
Highlight the shocking realization that military and intelligence agencies were in charge of Covid response

Expose Global Coordination
Show that the response was coordinated through military alliances like NATO
How It Started: Five Years Ago Today
On February 4th, 2020, two significant events occurred that played an important role in recent world history:
2
CBRN Emergency Declarations
EUA and PREP Act declarations for CBRN emergencies were registered by the U.S. HHS Secretary.
-12
Cases in US
There were fewer than a dozen confirmed Covid-19 cases in the US, and zero deaths.

1

EUA and PREP Act Declarations
Two declarations for CBRN emergencies made by the U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services

2

National Security Threat
A pharmaceutical executive reported being informed by the U.S. Department of Defense that the Sars-2 virus posed a national security threat
These events indicate that the beginnings of Covid were rooted in national security machinations, not public health considerations. They suggest the deployment of EUA "medical countermeasures" was launched when an emergency could not possibly be determined.
Why This Information Is Crucial
It is crucially important to understand that Covid was a globally coordinated response, based on legal frameworks intended for biodefense/biowarfare situations. The attack that initiated the global Covid response could have been real, perceived or invented.
1
Military Origins
The lockdown-until-vaccine paradigm originated in the military/intelligence biodefense playbook, not public health plans.
2
Not Public Health
Masking, distancing, lockdowns, and vaccines were not part of a public health plan to respond to a disease outbreak.
3
Biodefense Operations
Every aspect of the response was intended to induce public panic to gain compliance with biodefense operations.
4
Unregulated Injections
The response culminated with the injection of unregulated mRNA products, legally treated as biodefense military countermeasures, into billions of people.
Call to Action
We are calling on:

Investigators
To dig deeper into the military and intelligence aspects of the Covid response

Whistleblowers
To come forward with any relevant information

The Public
To help spread awareness of these findings
Call to Action
Most journalists in corporate and alternative media are unaware or unwilling to cover the military/intelligence aspects of Covid.
We need to change that.
Please help us shift the conversation to focus on the true nature of the Covid response and the existential questions it raises.
Significance of February 4, 2020 Events

National Security Focus
Indicates that Covid's beginnings were rooted in national security, not public health

Premature Emergency Declaration
Suggests deployment of countermeasures before a true emergency could be determined

Military Countermeasure Campaign
Launched against a poorly defined illness with few reported deaths worldwide
Global Lockdown Implementation
Within six weeks of February 4, 2020, the lockdown-until-vaccine response went into effect worldwide. This response:

Military Origin
Is a military/counterterrorism plan, not a public health measure

Market Creation
Aimed to ensure a market for countermeasures, among other goals

Global Coordination
Implemented simultaneously across many countries
Why This Information Is Crucial
Understanding the true nature of the Covid response is critical because:

Not Public Health
The response originated from military/intelligence biodefense playbooks, not public health plans

Induced Panic
Every aspect was designed to induce public panic for compliance with biodefense operations

Unregulated Products
Culminated in the injection of unregulated mRNA products into billions of people
Key Questions
The Covid Dossier raises important questions that need further investigation:

Who Ordered It?
Who directed these global operations?

Who Benefited?
Which entities or individuals profited from the response?

Who's Covering Up?
Who is still working to conceal the true nature of the events?
Call for Media Attention
Most journalists in both corporate and alternative spaces are either unaware or unwilling to cover the military/intelligence aspects of Covid. We need to change that by:

Shift the Conversation
Focus on the true nature of the Covid response

Raise Existential Questions
Address the implications of this coordinated global action

Demand Accountability
Push for investigations into the military and intelligence involvement
Further Research
To learn more about our findings, visit our Substacks:
Key Summary Articles
For top-level summaries of our understanding of the Covid response, read:

The Catastrophic Covid Convergence

Summary of Everything
Quick Links and Resources
Covid Dossier: United States
Key agencies and dates involved in the U.S. Covid response:

1

Mid-January 2020
National Security Council (NSC) begins classified Covid meetings

2

February 4, 2020
EUA and PREP Act declarations registered

3

March 13, 2020
NSC officially in charge of pandemic policy

4

March 18, 2020
FEMA/DHS takes over as Lead Federal Agency
U.S. Military and Intelligence Agencies Involved

National Security Council (NSC)
Coordinated overall pandemic response strategy

FEMA/ Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
Took over as Lead Federal Agency in March 2020

Department of Defense (DOD)
Involved in countermeasure development and distribution
U.S. Emergency Declarations

1

February 4, 2020
EUA declaration activated

2

February 4, 2020
PREP Act declaration (retroactive from March 17, 2020)

3

March 13, 2020
Stafford Act invoked in all states simultaneously (first time in history)
U.S. Agencies Involved in Messaging and Censorship

Government Task Force
Coordinated by NSC, controlled all pandemic messaging from February 27, 2020

Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
Involved in monitoring and countering "disinformation"

Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)
Focused on online information control

Cyber Threat Intelligence League (CTIL)
Cross-border US/UK initiative for information operations
Key U.S. Figures Linked to Military/Intelligence
Deborah Birx
White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator, former U.S. Army physician
Michael Callahan
DARPA consultant, involved in early Covid response
Richard Danzig
Former Secretary of the Navy, biodefense expert
More Key U.S. Figures
Richard Hatchett
CEO of CEPI, former BARDA official
Matt Hepburn
DARPA program manager, led Operation Warp Speed
Robert Kadlec
Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, biodefense expert
Covid Dossier: United Kingdom
Key agencies and dates involved in the UK Covid response:

1

March 18, 2020
Covid Support Force (20,000 military personnel) established

2

May 2020
Joint Biosecurity Centre (JBC) operational
UK Military and Intelligence Agencies Involved

Ministry of Defense (MOD)
"Operation Rescript" coordinated military support

Covid Support Force
20,000 military personnel deployed for pandemic response

Joint Biosecurity Centre (JBC)
Intelligence-led organization guiding pandemic decision-making
UK Emergency Declarations

1

March 23, 2020
National lockdown announced

2

March 25, 2020
Coronavirus Act 2020 enacted
UK Agencies Involved in Messaging and Censorship

Ministry of Defense team
Tasked with tackling "fake news" and scams

iSAGE
Independent SAGE group with intelligence connections

77th Brigade
Military unit specializing in information warfare

Nudge Unit / Behavioral Insights Team
Government-linked behavioral science group
Key UK Figures Linked to Military/Intelligence
Roy Anderson
Imperial College professor, former Chief Scientific Adviser to the Ministry of Defence
Dominic Cummings
Former chief adviser to PM Boris Johnson, involved in pandemic response
Jeremy Farrar
Director of Wellcome Trust, involved in early pandemic response
More Key UK Figures
Clare Gardiner
Former director general of the Joint Biosecurity Centre
Tom Hurd
Former director general for the Office for Security and Counter-Terrorism
Thomas Waite
Interim chief executive of the UK Health Security Agency
Covid Dossier: Australia
Key agencies and committees involved in the Australian Covid response:

National Cabinet
"Exempt from freedom of information laws"

National Security Committee of Cabinet
High-level decision-making body

Australian Defense Force COVID-19 Task Force
Military support for pandemic response

National COVID-19 Commission Advisory Board (NCC)
Business-led advisory group
Australian Agencies: Dates of Public Involvement

1

March 9, 2020
Australian Defense Force COVID-19 Task Force established

2

March 13, 2020
National Cabinet established

3

March 25, 2020
National COVID-19 Commission Advisory Board (NCC) announced
Australian Emergency Declarations

1

March 5, 2020
National Coordination Mechanism activated

2

March 13, 2020
National Partnership on COVID-19 Response established

3

March 18, 2020
Human Biosecurity Emergency Declaration (first in history)
Key Australian Figures Linked to Military/Intelligence/WHO
Lt Gen John Frewen
Coordinator-General of the National COVID Vaccine Taskforce
Jane Halton
Former WHO board member, chair of the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations
Edward Holmes
Virologist with connections to Wellcome Trust and Chinese research institutions
Covid Dossier: Canada
Key agencies and committees involved in the Canadian Covid response:

Canadian Armed Forces (CAF)
Operation LASER: 24,000-person response force

CAF Operation VECTOR
Vaccine planning and distribution

Cabinet Committee on COVID-19
High-level government coordination
Canadian Agencies: Dates of Public Involvement

1

January 23, 2020
First Operation LASER planning meeting

2

March 2, 2020
Operation LASER officially launched

3

March 4, 2020
Cabinet Committee on COVID-19 officially announced
Canadian Emergency Declarations
In Canada, emergency declarations were made by individual provinces:

1

March 13-22, 2020
All provinces and territories declared states of emergency or public health emergencies
Canadian Agencies Involved in Messaging and Intelligence

Canadian Armed Forces (CAF)
Began gathering intelligence on pandemic disinformation in January 2020

Canadian Joint Operations Command (CJOC)
Involved in information operations related to the pandemic

Precision Information Team (PiT)
Canadian military intelligence unit that data-mined social media during the pandemic
Key Canadian Figures Linked to Military/Intelligence/NATO
Bill Blair
Former Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness
Chrystia Freeland
Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance, former journalist with intelligence connections
Brian Santarpia
Vice Admiral, Commander of the Canadian Joint Operations Command
Covid Dossier: Netherlands
Key agencies and alliances involved in the Dutch Covid response:

National Coordinator for Security and Counterterrorism (NCTV)
Coordinated security aspects of pandemic response

NATO
Involved in coordinating response through alliance obligations

European Union
Provided framework for coordinated EU-wide response
Dutch Emergency Declarations

1

March 15, 2020
"New additional measures" announced (closure of schools, restaurants, sports facilities)

2

March 23, 2020
"Intelligent lockdown" announced
Dutch Agencies Involved in Messaging and Censorship

Ministry of Defense Land Information Manoeuvre Centre (LIMC)
Collected information on citizens during the crisis

National Coordinator for Security and Counterterrorism (NCTV)
Involved in monitoring and countering "disinformation"

National Core Team Crisis Communication (NKC)
Led by NCTV, coordinated crisis communication

Interdepartmental Working Group on Disinformation
Included Defense, Foreign Affairs, and Justice Departments
Key Dutch Figures Linked to Military/Intelligence/NATO/EU
Marion Koopmans
Virologist, member of WHO advisory group on COVID-19
Pieter-Jaap Aalbersberg
National Coordinator for Security and Counterterrorism
Covid Dossier: Germany
Key agencies, committees, and groups involved in the German Covid response:

1

February 27/28, 2020
Corona Crisis Team (Corona-Krisenstab) established

2

November 2021
New Crisis Team for vaccines led by military established
German Agencies and Alliances Involved

Corona Crisis Team
Led by Ministry of Health and Ministry of the Interior

Military-led Crisis Team for Vaccines
Established in November 2021

NATO
Involved in coordinating response through alliance obligations
Key German Figures Linked to NATO, UN/WHO, Military, Intelligence
Major General Carsten Breuer
Head of Germany's COVID-19 crisis team
General Hans-Ulrich Holtherm
Head of the Bundeswehr's medical service
Christian Drosten
More Key German Figures
Heiko Rottman-Grossner
Expert in global health security
Bernhard Schwartländer
Chef de Cabinet of the World Health Organization
Covid Dossier: Italy
While we don't have the full list of Italian agencies, dates, and emergency declarations, there is compelling evidence of NATO involvement in coordinating the Covid response in Italy:

CTS Establishment
Commissione Tecnico Scientifica (Technical Scientific Committee) established on February 5, 2020

NATO Involvement
Minutes from a CTS meeting on March 5, 2020, mention a NATO representative
Italian CTS and NATO Connection
Key points from the CTS meeting minutes:

NATO Representative
General Bonfiglio, identified as belonging to the "NATO UEO point of the DPC," was present

Confidentiality
Emphasized handling of confidential documentation and restricted external communication

Document Transmission
CTS documents to be transmitted through NATO UEO Point and Ministry of Health
Military/Intelligence/Biodefense Plans & Alliances
The following plans and alliances provide frameworks for responding to a bioterror/bioweapons attack, potentially invoked in the global Covid response:

U.S. CBRN Response
Joint doctrine for military response to chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear incidents

Medical Countermeasures Consortium
Four-nation partnership involving Australia, Canada, UK, and US

Quadripartite Medical Intelligence Committee (QMIC)
Health equivalent of the Five Eyes intelligence-sharing alliance
NATO and EU Biodefense Frameworks

NATO Joint CBRN Defence Centre of Excellence
Multinational organization for CBRN defense capability development

EU Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP)
Framework for EU military and civilian missions outside the EU
Implications of Military/Intelligence Involvement
The extensive military and intelligence agency involvement in the Covid response raises several concerns:

Lack of Transparency
Many decisions were made behind closed doors, away from public scrutiny

Overreach of Authority
Military involvement in civilian affairs may have exceeded normal boundaries

Suppression of Dissent
Intelligence agencies' role in monitoring and countering "disinformation" may have stifled legitimate debate
Questions Raised by the Covid Dossier

Decision-Making Process
How were key decisions about lockdowns, vaccines, and other measures made?

Accountability
Who is responsible for the consequences of these decisions?

Future Implications
How will this precedent affect future health crises or other emergencies?

Democratic Oversight
How can we ensure proper civilian oversight of military/intelligence involvement in public health?
The Need for Further Investigation
The Covid Dossier highlights the need for comprehensive investigations into:

Decision-Making Processes
How and why military/intelligence agencies became central to the Covid response

Legal Frameworks
The use and potential misuse of emergency powers and biodefense laws

Information Control
The extent and impact of censorship and propaganda efforts

Global Coordination
The role of international organizations and alliances in shaping national responses
Potential Consequences of Military/Intelligence Led Response

Erosion of Trust
Public confidence in health institutions and government may be undermined

Precedent Setting
May normalize military involvement in future public health or other crises

Policy Distortion
Health policies may have been influenced by non-health related agendas

Civil Liberties
Potential long-term impacts on privacy and freedom of speech
The Role of Whistleblowers
Whistleblowers play a crucial role in exposing hidden aspects of the Covid response:

Inside Information
Can provide details not available through official channels

Accountability
Help hold decision-makers responsible for their actions

Public Interest
Serve the public's right to know about government operations
Challenges in Investigating the Covid Response
Researchers face several obstacles in uncovering the full story:

Classified Information
Many key documents remain secret or heavily redacted

Complex Networks
Intricate web of agencies and alliances involved

Ongoing Operations
Some aspects of the response are still active, limiting disclosure

Media Reluctance
Mainstream media often hesitant to cover these aspects
The Importance of International Comparison
Examining the Covid response across multiple countries reveals:

Common Patterns
Similar military/intelligence involvement across nations

Coordinated Actions
Evidence of international alignment in response strategies

Varied Transparency
Differences in public disclosure between countries
Lessons for Future Crisis Management
The Covid Dossier highlights important considerations for handling future crises:

Civilian Oversight
Ensure proper checks and balances on military/intelligence involvement

Transparency
Improve public communication and reduce unnecessary secrecy

Expert Diversity
Include a wider range of expertise in decision-making processes

Legal Frameworks
Review and update laws governing emergency powers
The Role of Independent Media
Independent journalists and researchers are crucial in uncovering the full story:

Investigative Reporting
Digging deeper into official narratives and uncovering hidden facts

Alternative Perspectives
Providing viewpoints often overlooked by mainstream media

Public Awareness
Bringing important issues to light and fostering informed debate
Call for Academic Research
The Covid Dossier highlights the need for rigorous academic study in several areas:

Policy Analysis
Examining the effectiveness and consequences of military-led health interventions

Legal Studies
Investigating the use and potential abuse of emergency powers

Sociology
Studying the societal impacts of prolonged military involvement in civilian affairs

Political Science
Analyzing changes in governance models during and after the crisis
The Path Forward
Moving forward, several steps are crucial to address the issues raised by the Covid Dossier:

Public Inquiries
Establish independent commissions to investigate the Covid response

Legislative Review
Reassess and potentially reform laws governing crisis response

International Cooperation
Foster transparent collaboration for future global health challenges

Civil Society Engagement
Encourage public participation in shaping future crisis management policies
Conclusion: The Importance of the Covid Dossier
The Covid Dossier serves as a crucial resource for understanding the true nature of the global pandemic response. By exposing the extensive military and intelligence involvement, it challenges our understanding of how public health crises are managed and raises important questions about governance, transparency, and civil liberties.
As we move forward, it is essential that we learn from this experience, fostering open dialogue, demanding accountability, and ensuring that future crisis responses prioritize public health and democratic values.
The Covid Dossier is not just a historical record, but a call to action for citizens, journalists, researchers, and policymakers to critically examine and improve our systems for handling global emergencies.
  • This resource is created by Interest of Justice, to assist mankind's awakening & empowerment! Please share far & wide!